Machine learning models represent invaluable assets for business leaders. They help decipher historical data, formulate strategies for future endeavors, enhance customer interactions, identify fraudulent activities, and fulfill numerous other functions.
Even with this, an inadequately trained or maintained ML model has the potential to yield outputs that are not only unproductive but also potentially misleading. In the subsequent discussion, a number of esteemed members of the Forbes Technology Council highlight several prevalent errors that businesses must conscientiously sidestep during the development and implementation of ML models.
Mistaking "Information" for "Data"
In the realm of machine learning (ML), distinguishing between “information” and “data” is paramount. One common error among businesses is conflating these terms. To effectively train ML models, it’s imperative to recognize that information, not raw data is the fuel. Ensuring that the data possesses requisite characteristics – such as appropriate variance, absence of bias, balance, and relevant business features – is crucial. Clean, quality data devoid of impurities, often termed “dirty data,” is essential for uncovering patterns and facilitating robust model training.
Training with sensitive data
Businesses must exercise caution when training ML models with sensitive information. While teaching a generalized model using such data may seem innocuous, the risks are substantial. Blending data set features into generalized relationships between features and labels may obscure potential vulnerabilities. However, an emerging threat landscape comprises inference and membership attacks aimed at extracting and reconstructing original data. These vulnerabilities can expose organizations to various risks associated with data disclosure.
Utilizing biased, incomplete, or inaccurate data
The age-old adage “garbage in, garbage out” is relevant in today’s machine learning and generative AI landscape. Many organizations need to work on using biased, incomplete, or inaccurate data, which inevitably leads to flawed and biased outputs from ML models. Enhancing model performance necessitates the adoption of better, more comprehensive data sets.
Overlooking data preprocessing
The efficacy of machine learning models hinges on the quality of the training data. Neglecting data preprocessing, including addressing outliers, missing data, and encoding errors, can severely impact model performance. Investing both time and effort into understanding the intricacies of the data and conducting thorough preprocessing are imperative steps in model development.
Inadequate sample data usage
Only underestimating the volume of sample data required for effective ML model development is a common pitfall for businesses. Building accurate and successful ML models typically demands a substantial volume of sample training data points, often numbering in the hundreds of thousands.
Incorrect model and data formatting
Practical model training necessitates high-quality, validated data. Input data that lacks utility can result in ineffective models. Errors such as missing data, incorrect dimensional values, coding discrepancies, and improper formatting can compromise the accuracy of ML model outputs. Implementing robust quality assurance measures to ensure models are built on sound data foundations is crucial.
Neglecting diversity investment
The efficacy of machine learning algorithms is contingent upon the diversity of their training data. Biases inherent in the training data invariably manifest in the algorithm’s outputs. Mitigating these biases necessitates early efforts to construct diverse and inclusive training data sets. Additionally, investing in diversity among ML engineers plays a pivotal role in fostering equitable and unbiased model development processes.
Underestimating the expense of quality data and the importance of iteration
Refraining from underestimating the cost of acquiring sufficient training data is a common oversight. An inadequately trained machine learning model exhibits undesirable behavior like an improperly trained child. It’s imperative to conduct thorough due diligence to ensure the creation of adequate training data. Furthermore, embracing a mindset of iteration is essential. Success in developing practical ML implementations often involves encountering setbacks and undergoing revisions. Developing the capacity for reevaluation and refinement is key.
Failure to automate processes
Many businesses overlook the significant effort required in MLOps. While selecting appropriate training data and architectures and consistently iterating enhance the accuracy of ML models, automating these processes for expedited iterations leads to reduced time to production and superior models.
Excessive reliance on ML systems
The tendency to place unwarranted confidence in ML systems is noteworthy. Observing tools like ChatGPT solving problems beyond their initial training may foster an exaggerated belief in the capabilities of ML systems. However, it’s essential to remain vigilant. Instances persist where ML models, such as those designed for skin disease recognition, fail to perform adequately on non-white skin tones. Ensuring robust training sets encompassing diverse scenarios is crucial for mitigating such issues.
Overfitting or underfitting data
Frequent patterns of overfitting or underfitting data are observed. Overfitting occurs when AI fixates excessively on past data, hindering its ability to analyze new information, while underfitting arises when AI overlooks finer patterns in favor of broader trends. Mitigating these issues involves training AI with consistent, relevant data and conducting thorough testing to ensure alignment with objectives.
Failure to consider a comprehensive range of real-world scenarios
Many businesses need to gather diverse and representative data sets that encapsulate the full spectrum of scenarios encountered in real-world settings. A robust data set facilitates learning from varied examples. Incorporating subject-matter expertise into data sets can benefit training models in industries lacking sufficient data.
Disregarding a holistic perspective
Conversations surrounding ML often focus on granular data-related issues, such as extraction and structure. However, businesses frequently neglect a broader perspective. Asking fundamental questions like, “Why did the ML model reach this decision?” is crucial for organizations viewing ML as a strategic capability. Prioritizing explainability and trustworthiness enables informed decision-making based on ML insights.
Failure to maintain and update models over time
A common pitfall is neglecting to update models periodically. Like running a business, machine learning models require ongoing maintenance rather than a “set it and forget it” approach. Embracing continuous learning involves refreshing models frequently to accommodate changes in data and environmental factors, ensuring sustained optimal performance.
Overlooking the role of creativity
Creativity often takes a backseat in the ML model training process within businesses. To avoid this pitfall, consider integrating gamification elements into data input procedures and fostering an environment where diverse teams are encouraged to identify unconventional patterns or challenge existing biases. The essence lies in inputting data and cultivating a creative atmosphere that stimulates thinking beyond conventional data paradigms.
Misjudging complex models for superior results
A prevalent misconception is equating complex models with superior outcomes, which can exacerbate overfitting issues. Rather than starting with intricate models, it’s prudent to commence with simpler ones and progressively introduce complexity based on validation performance and justified need. Employing cross-validation and regularization techniques is essential in mitigating overfitting risks.
Underestimating the relevance of domain expertise
Businesses often need to pay more attention to the significance of domain expertise in ML model training. Collaborating with experts possessing profound knowledge of the problem domain can yield invaluable insights, optimize model performance, and inform the selection of pertinent features. Integrating domain expertise empowers businesses to augment the accuracy and applicability of their machine-learning solutions.
Neglecting adequate model interpretation
The absence of robust model interpretation and explainability mechanisms poses significant challenges. Businesses must grasp the underlying principles guiding machine learning model predictions or decisions. Instead of relying solely on opaque “black box” models, leveraging interpretable models like decision trees or linear models can offer insights into the underlying patterns and factors driving predictions.
Mishandling novel data
Incorporating unfamiliar data into model training warrants a systematic and iterative approach. When confronted with unknown data, it is crucial to segregate it and manually verify its accuracy before integration into the training model. Maintaining version control and refining the model’s training process enhances accuracy and performance.
Underestimating cloud training costs
Businesses should exercise caution in presuming that cloud platforms inherently provide the optimal cost and performance balance. Practical training hinges on robust data access and GPU infrastructure. While cloud providers tout pay-per-use economics with GPUs, expenses escalate rapidly due to the iterative nature of training. Furthermore, transferring enterprise-scale data to the cloud incurs substantial costs. Exploring on-premises training options merits consideration to manage expenses effectively.
OptScale, an open source platform with MLOps and FinOps capabilities, offers complete transparency and optimization of cloud expenses across various organizations and features MLOps tools such as hyperparameter tuning, tracking experiments, versioning models, and ML leaderboards → Try it out in OptScale demo
